How can this possibly be just?
*ETA* This is the shoddy excuse for an upholder of the law who released him!
"Lady Justice Hallett said there was "little or nothing" Lord Ahmed could have done to avoid the collision".
I beg to differ. He could have kept his hands on his steering wheel and his eyes on the road!
"She said he had never been accused of, or admitted, causing death by dangerous driving".
What??? I would have thought the vast majority of people who have been jailed for manslaughter following road accidents had never done it before, so how many times do you have to do it before you are really punished?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 08:50 pm (UTC)I don't drive myself but I fail to see how anyone can think sending or reading a text while driving is a sensible thing to do no matter how empty the road seems!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-12 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 11:14 am (UTC)The first time I heard of this was at the original sentencing which I thought was ludicrously light ... But then the details came out.
If I remember right, the other driver came spinning into his path, hit the central reservation, and ended up stopped facing the wrong way in the fast lane. If memory serves the other guy was held entirely responsible for the accident and his own death.
It was clearly established the chap was going to die anyway and our texting peer not to blame.
He wasn't texting at the time of the accident, but several minutes beforehand. He was presumably only caught as in the course of the investigation police will have checked phone records.
He was not jailed for manslaughter, but solely for using a mobile phone whilst driving. So the fact that someone died is entirely irrelevant as it was not connected with the court case, or his conviction.
So he probably did have his hands on the steering wheel at the time.
Oddly (as I rant enough about the system), I'm perfectly comfortable with both the sentence and the early release. Is jail an really an appropriate sentence merely for using a mobile? I've seen hundreds do it, and turn round to yell at the kids, eat a burger, shave, do their mascara, reach over for a tape that's fallen in the passenger footwell etc.
I know I've done a few of these types of thing, and I'm sure you have too.
So I actually think this is the justice system doing what it's supposed to for a change.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 01:22 pm (UTC)I'm afraid I have no faith in the law after the idiot who knocked husband off his bike was given £100 fine and 3 points on his licence. Hardly taught him a lesson when husband is now permanently disabled. I was caught speeding and got the same 3 points and a £60 fine! No, I shouldn't have been speeding but genuinely didn't see the signs on the dual carriageway telling me the speed limit was 40mph. No defence but thankfully I dind't hurt anyone.
Nevertheless I stand corrected and this discussion could go on and on....
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 02:06 pm (UTC)Given the cost of prison, I think it far more appropriate to send this guy on a driver training day, then make him pass his *bike* test. Once he's fallen off, realised it hurts, and twigged just how vulnerable he is, I reckon he'd think twice before answering the next text.
Mind there probably is a fair chance that even though not to blame, he'll have it on his conscience for years.
It is remarkable the sixth sense you seem to develop for idiots about to pull out though, after a few years on bikes.
Faith in the justice system? Ha! Lots less than I once did...
Remember I mentioned the nice man who made me an ex biker for a few years who did a U turn into the side of my lovely almost mint bike? He was uninsured, no MOT, and the police were bringing a case of dangerous driving (not without due care, the worse one).
I duly took my day off work and turned up at court to give evidence, along with a couple of pedestrians who'd seen it. The police had "lost" all the paperwork, so all charges dropped.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-13 08:39 pm (UTC)The lad who knocked my husband off his bike had just passed his test and was offered a new driver's version of the speed awareness course which he would have had to pay for but no points on his licence. He refused to do it and to have his day in court...then he put in a plea of guilty and received his 'punishment'. Two weeks later he was driving round in a new car!
How can the police drop the bloodyc ase because they 'lost' the paperwork. FFS!